Sherwood RX4105 2-Channel 100 Watts Stereo Receiver

Found this at Amazon – thought I would show you

  • Total Discrete Amplifier stage for all channels
  • 5 Audio Inputs (Including Tuner)
  • Sleep Timer
  • Bass and Treble control
  • Measures 17.4 x 4.9 x 14 inches (W x H x D)

Product Description
In modern, surround sound driven audio universe where home theater enthusiasts hear airplanes fly overhead and bombs exploding around them, one might think that mere Stereo is old fashioned. But don’t be mislead – humans have only two ears and stereo is still a significant life form.The case in point: the RX-4105. It’s actually an update of the market leading RX-4100/4103. Rated at 100 watts, Sherwood Electronic has reduced distortion significantly. It’s now less th… More >>

Sherwood RX4105 2-Channel 100 Watts Stereo Receiver

Share, Tweet and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Furl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
  • TwitThis
Posted by Blogtip Staff - Visit Blogtip.net and search for your tip or add your own right now!


Comments (5)    Posted in Uncategorized    

Subscribe RSS 2.0 feed. Leave a response, or Trackback from your own site.





5 Responses to 'Sherwood RX4105 2-Channel 100 Watts Stereo Receiver'

  1. J. Flagler - February 9th, 2010 at 9:25 am

    I read the reviews and figured this receiver would fit my needs. What I didn’t expect was to have to take it to a repair center as soon as I got it to fix the loud hum from the speakers. That was today and they estimate that it will be three weeks before I get it back. I wish I had never bought it.

    Update: I’m too angry to write anything, nor do I want to waste any more time, I’m just going to write off the 90 bucks I paid, but if you even think of buying any product from Sherwood please read this review for this receiver:

    NIGHTMARISH experience with this receiver, August 4, 2005

    Reviewer: LC Ricker “baking mama” (Portland, ME) – See all my reviews


    Rating: 1 / 5

  2. Yu Zhang - February 9th, 2010 at 9:29 am

    I just bought one. The sound is pretty good. I like it. Good choice for those who don’t want a 5.1 receiver.
    Rating: 4 / 5

  3. Raleigh Kris - February 9th, 2010 at 10:15 am

    The price is great, the specifications are great, and the product looks and feels great in person. Unfortunately the sound is very, very bad.

    I am not an audiophile. I am happy with tv speakers as long as they work. The problem is that many tv manufacturers are making their flat panel tv’s with extremely bad speakers which makes it necessary to get your sound from elsewhere. When I bought this Sherwood receiver I wasn’t looking for incredible sound, just sound that I could hear clearly from about 7 feet from the TV. Well, it gets loud enough but there is just something very strange about the sound quality. It sound muddy with some things, and a combination of hollow or screechy with others. I even hooked up a 30 band equalizer to try and balance out the sound and I couldn’t get it to sound right.

    My old JVC reciever died on me and I never even thought twice about the way it sounded because it just sounded kind of right. I guess you don’t know what sounds right until you hear something horrible and this receiver sounds horrible.
    Rating: 1 / 5

  4. W. Morton - February 9th, 2010 at 12:26 pm

    Don’t be Dont be deceived by the good looks of this receiver and the Sherwood name. These are garbage,and not even worth their $89.00 price. I know of 2 other poeple that have purchased these,and have had the same experience with them that I have. The audio quality is worse than any receiver I have ever heard. Comparable with a boom box in quality. There is also no way that these put out anything close to 105 watts per channel. Not even close.

    Save your money,and spend $150-$200 for a decent 100 watt receiver. Common sense dictates that you aren’t going to get much for $89.00,and this Sherwood receiver proves it. A pretty $89.00 box with bad sound….
    Rating: 1 / 5

  5. Charles Titus - February 9th, 2010 at 2:53 pm

    I bought it to replace a unit that I have had since 1970 and it started to go bad. The first one would pick up no FM and very weak AM. Yes antennas

    were connected, Amazon sent another (great service) it worked the same way.

    Returned it gave up on them.
    Rating: 1 / 5


Leave a Reply